|
Tm Uzi
Jun 1, 2007 13:11:08 GMT
Post by charlieboy on Jun 1, 2007 13:11:08 GMT
ok now u are doin wat i did, u are having sessions of about 2 weeks, where u really wont one gun, and the after that u realise how inpractical it is, and go onto the next one, my advice is buy your next gun, when u have been wanting it for 2 MONTHS....like my minimis
|
|
Haz
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
I will shoot you, try me.
Posts: 111
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 1, 2007 14:07:34 GMT
Post by Haz on Jun 1, 2007 14:07:34 GMT
Yer but i have been wanting to buy the .44 magnum for ageees
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 2, 2007 2:25:28 GMT
Post by Will Horton on Jun 2, 2007 2:25:28 GMT
How is an AK47-S any less "spray and pray" than any other gun? Not only does it have the "spray" factor by being incredibly inaccurate, but it also has the "pray" function as the holder can use it to make prayers to Allah when he/she puts a jihad on someone.
In the manual for the gun it clearly states "Gun has two firing options: From the hip while running; and holding sideways above the head with one hand while screaming (guaranteed to make gun at least 30% less accurate, or your two chickens back! Remember - lower accuracy = more civilian kills!) If you find that your AK47 is shooting in a straght line, then your gun has been stolen from the Russians. Rectify this problem by applying well placed hammer strokes to the side of the barrel. If problem persists, coat your AK47 in gold plating and present it to your nearest dictator."
|
|
Haz
Warrant Officer 2nd Class
I will shoot you, try me.
Posts: 111
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 2, 2007 13:12:44 GMT
Post by Haz on Jun 2, 2007 13:12:44 GMT
HA lol yer. Well i suppose the bb version isnt that much of spray and pray, nd can be used as an aeg. But the real yer so true. Although its kinda funny, on the internet i saw a picture of an iraqi, praying to allah on his mat with 2 ak's, one on his back and the other in his hands while he was praying.
Btw Will i dont think i've actually ever heard you speak so much of the truth, nt calling you a lier but its is very true.
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 3, 2007 19:17:48 GMT
Post by Will Lewin on Jun 3, 2007 19:17:48 GMT
why is the ak any better than say an m4 or an mp5 in closed quarters?
i fired phils AK the other day and it no-longer has any accuracy since his problem at the riding school. The hop-up is screwed too. You couldn't hit a barn door with it now.
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 3, 2007 21:10:03 GMT
Post by Will Dendy on Jun 3, 2007 21:10:03 GMT
Well in terms of airsoft there is indeed very little difference, however with the real steal you'd be better off with an AK in close quarters because it fires a heavier projectile at higher velocities so it's bullets would go straight through obstacles such as brick walls that a 5.56 from an M4 or a 9mm from an MP5 would just bounce off.
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 4, 2007 16:11:52 GMT
Post by charlieboy on Jun 4, 2007 16:11:52 GMT
but a an mp5 with "dum dums" would be way better because of its more accurate, heavier projectile (it fires a pistol bullet and an ak fires a rifle bullet) lighter recoil, smaller gun, smaller mags, higher rof and the list is endless
and when would u need a bullet to go through a wall anyway??!!?!?!? the reason mp5s dont is because they are not biult to.
they were manely used in hostage situations where u dont want the bullet to go through the person and into the guy on the other side, or through a wall where it could hurt someone.
but he ak would have upsides, like if they are wearing flak jackets...
" O no, their wearing flak jackets!!!" (dude with ak aims at terrorist"
"BANG" "hes not anymore"
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 4, 2007 18:17:22 GMT
Post by Will Dendy on Jun 4, 2007 18:17:22 GMT
Yeah, but using disintegrating ammo is a grey area for civilian usage, and definetly illegal for military usage, making it hard to justify.
And are you telling me that a 9x19 is more accurate and does more damage than a 7.62x39?
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 6, 2007 21:04:34 GMT
Post by Will Lewin on Jun 6, 2007 21:04:34 GMT
Dum dums are useful in a crowd as they do not penetrate several targets. allowing you to kill the terrorist without killing members of the crowd he is in. However they are highly illeagal due to the the severe damage they cause.
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 7, 2007 16:39:43 GMT
Post by charlieboy on Jun 7, 2007 16:39:43 GMT
thank you Lewin! and yes, an mp5 is more accurate AT CLOSE RANGE(i think we are talking about CQB?) or so i am told by a person who has fired both
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 26, 2007 20:35:15 GMT
Post by Will Lewin on Jun 26, 2007 20:35:15 GMT
In northern Ireland, on bloody Sunday, members of the parachute regiment were critisized for using dum dums to shoot supposed IRA gunmen. There is a lot of controversy over whether the IRA members were armed or not but I personally believe that if the Paras had been using the standard 7.62 lon the bullets could easily have passed straight through the IRA members and then, possibly, into unarmed civilians behind them. However, this still makes it hard to explain why they were using amunition that causes severe wounds and internal damage that is virtually impossible to treat.
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 27, 2007 13:28:22 GMT
Post by Mario on Jun 27, 2007 13:28:22 GMT
i cant remember what they are called, but you get really cool bullets that are not metal, (carbon or something) that are used only for cqb. They shatter on hard objects like walls, but go through people and shatter on their bones (if it hits the bone).
you probably meant that mp5s are more controllable in cqb and therefore accurate (less recoil)
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 28, 2007 12:03:05 GMT
Post by Piers Lodwick on Jun 28, 2007 12:03:05 GMT
arnt they called they dum dums
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jun 28, 2007 17:19:03 GMT
Post by charlieboy on Jun 28, 2007 17:19:03 GMT
omg piers read the freaking thread!! ok guys wat shud i get Tm m14 socom Marushin mk2 Gbb carbine 8mm 450 fps :0 similar priced wat du u reckon?
|
|
|
Tm Uzi
Jul 10, 2007 21:02:28 GMT
Post by Will Lewin on Jul 10, 2007 21:02:28 GMT
if you get an m14 get 1 like piers had that was good. the other thing looks weird
|
|